At EP-ology, Carl Phillips has a new post on the World Health Organization’s failure to care about suffering. It’s worth reading — especially if you (still) believe that the WHO’s main aim is promoting health.
Phillips’s focus in that post is on a new WHO Atlas on headaches
and the problem that headaches cause people to stay home from work, or work less productively. The agency estimates that Europe-wide, the lost productivity from migraines alone is worth 155 billion euros each year. It isn’t that you feel crummy when your head hurts, and that chronic headache makes your life miserable. It’s that you might not perform your expected per-capita service to the expansion of wealth.
Here’s how EP-ology assesses the agency:
The WHO is not the humanitarian organization that many people might think it is. It is a special-interest medical-industry-oriented organization with an emphasis on the interests of governments, not people. Its emphasis on productivity in looking at headaches … ignores people’s welfare…
Now, I can’t agree with Phillips’s analysis that the WHO’s ethical system is either “communist” or “fascist.” For self-described public health agencies like the WHO to be concerned primarily with productivity and the generation of wealth — and only secondarily, if at all, with suffering — has been a hallmark of capitalism since the British Parliament passed the world’s first Public Health Act in 1848.
In fact, the laws institutionalizing public health in Britain in the late 1840s were passed by the Whig (liberal, more or less) government of Lord John Russell. Public health was a legacy of efforts not by the nascent socialist and communist movements, but by radical capitalists — who sought to secure a moderately hale labor force to serve British industry with little cost to the factory owners. And aimed to blame individuals for their own misery.
But it’s impossible to disagree with the main point of Phillips’s post: WHO’s aim is to serve industry.
As further evidence, consider this follow-up note on Tamiflu by Helen Epstein, published in the May 26th issue of NY Review of Books (I discussed Epstein’s main article in a post last month). It seems more and more apparent that potential dangers of Tamiflu (oseltamivir) in children were ignored. Epstein reports that
the risks of delirium and unconscious episodes were indeed significantly elevated in children who took Tamiflu, especially if they took the drug during the first day or so after influenza symptoms appeared…. If these results are confirmed, they are especially worrying, since the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control both recommend that Tamiflu be taken as soon as possible after symptoms appear.
I was not the only one unaware of this important study; neither, apparently, were the World Health Organization, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the US Centers for Disease Control. When I contacted these agencies in January and February 2011, their spokespeople assured me that there was no evidence that Tamiflu causes neuropsychiatric side effects in children. [emphasis added]
In the rush to move taxpayer monies into the hands of wealthy private corporations, the WHO (with CDC and other agencies) proclaimed a flu emergency in 2009. And ignored evidence on possible dangers of the products they were touting as part of the “preparedness” response.